|
commons.wikimedia.org |
I've read a lot recently about fiction categories on Amazon, both for a reader choosing a book, and for an author placing books for potential readers to find.
Browsing through the mystery and crime fiction genre, trying to identify the best slot for my
Esme Quentin mysteries, I came to the conclusion that there's a case to be made for a new sub-category.
On the one hand we've got
hard-boiled, gritty and
noir, and at the opposite end of the spectrum we've got
cozy. But is that enough?
OK, so there's
suspense and
psychological, there's
murder-mystery and
police procedural, there's
forensic and
historical crime, there's
legal thriller and
spy. But I think what I have a problem with, is the
cozy category. Does that give us enough information? Are we associating it too closely with
cosy -
comfortable or snug - and missing a trick?
Cozy
The word
cozy is, I presume, a corruption of
cozen, meaning
to cheat, defraud; beguile; act deceitfully. In a Crime Fiction context, Wikipedia defines
cozy as,
"a sub-genre of detective fiction in which profanity, sex and violence are downplayed or treated humorously."
|
pixabay.com |
Putting the issue of cozy not being limited to detective fiction to one side for a moment, I'd happily agree that a mix of crime fiction and humour easily fits into the cozy category. But what about
downplayed? While any reader choosing a cozy novel can be confident there will be no graphic scenes or excessive violence, has the term become unfairly synonymous with whimsical and lightweight?
Interestingly, listed on the line above cozen in my 1964 edition of the Concise Oxford Dictionary is the verb,
to coze, (a new one on me) meaning
to (have a) chat! Is it a coincidence, I wonder, that the marrying of these two concepts -
coze,
a chat, and
cosy,
a c
overing to retain heat in teapot - evokes the very British pastime of sharing a cuppa and a natter on a sofa!
But I digress. Or perhaps I don't. Maybe that's exactly the issue!
Robert Goddard
This sub-genre question is one on which I've pondered in respect of one of my favourite authors, Robert Goddard. Referred to as "the master of the double twist", his books are billed as thrillers but they're essentially intricate webs of intrigue, bluffs and double bluffs. Because the unravelling of the mystery is where the focus lies, any violence is low-key or, it might be argued,
downplayed.
But I doubt anyone, least of all his publishers, would label his novels as
cozy.
Robert Goddard was a relative unknown when his early books came out. Fortunately, his publisher kept the faith (not sure that would happen today!) and now he's highly successful. I've often wondered whether having no identifiable sub-genre worked against him. Had he written police procedurals, for example, would he have found his thousands of fans earlier? Even now, his status as a thriller author gives little guidance as to the type of novel he writes.
Get SMART
So, back to the beginning of this post. Is it time to invent a new category (or perhaps several)? And if so, what could they be? An acronym might be the answer.
NEAT might help identify a novel without violence, blood and gore, perhaps, standing for
No
Excessive
Aggression
Tale. Or how about
CLEVA (pronounced "clever")
- Content
Lacking
Excessive
Violence or
Aggression? Or maybe
COOL?
Contains
Only
Obligatory
L... Mmm. I'll get back to you on that one.
But then I realised that each of these was negative - a declaration of what was NOT contained in the book. How much better to champion what
was?
So, after chewing my way through my Roget's Thesaurus, I hope the following holds more promise.
Who wouldn't want to read a
SMART thriller, denoting that inside the pages lurks a tale of
Secrets,
Mystery
And a
Revealing
Twist?
What d'you think? Perhaps you've got some ideas of your own?
So, here's the challenge. Let's come up with something
so brilliant that the crime fiction fraternity, readers and writers both, can't wait to adopt it.
I look forward to hearing your feedback and any suggestions you have of your own!